- Z-Score
- 0.00weighted sum of the terms
- Zone
- —Altman's published bands
- Largest contributor
- —where to start reading
Without JavaScript, the formula is written out in full below and can be computed by hand from the same figures.
Nothing is stored or transmitted. Coefficients and zone thresholds are those published by Edward Altman; the arithmetic here is only the weighted sum.

The formula being computed
For a public manufacturer: Z = 1.2·(working capital / total assets) + 1.4·(retained earnings / total assets) + 3.3·(EBIT / total assets) + 0.6·(market value of equity / total liabilities) + 1.0·(sales / total assets). Distress below 1.81, safe above 2.99, grey in between.
The private variant re-fits every coefficient and replaces market equity with book equity: Z' = 0.717·A + 0.847·B + 3.107·C + 0.420·D + 0.998·E, with 1.23 and 2.90 as the thresholds. The non-manufacturer variant drops the turnover term because asset turnover is not comparable across service businesses. The full explanation covers what each term measures and where the model stops applying.
Which figures to enter
Working capital is current assets minus current liabilities. Retained earnings and total assets come straight from the balance sheet, EBIT and sales from the income statement. The equity figure depends on the variant: market capitalization for the public version, book value of equity for the other two, and the calculator relabels that field when you switch, because entering the wrong one is the most common way to produce a confidently wrong score.
Units do not matter as long as they are consistent, since every term is a ratio. Thousands, millions or units all give the same result provided the whole set uses one scale. What does matter is using figures from the same reporting date; mixing a current market capitalization with a two-year-old balance sheet produces a number that describes no moment that ever existed.
Why the breakdown matters more than the total
Because the formula is a weighted sum, a score can be decomposed exactly. A company scoring 1.6 because its EBIT term is near zero is in a different situation from one scoring 1.6 because retained earnings are deeply negative after years of losses. The first is an operating problem, the second a history. The total cannot distinguish them and the term breakdown does, which is why it is shown here rather than the number alone. That is also why a single composite is a poor verdict on its own: the screening section covers what a filter silently removes before any score is computed, and the F-Score worksheet reports its failed tests for the same reason.
Using the calculator
Which variant should I use?
The public-manufacturer version where the company is listed and industrial; the private variant where there is no market price; and the non-manufacturer variant for service businesses and emerging markets, which drops asset turnover entirely. Choosing the variant is a precondition for the number meaning anything, not a refinement.
Why does my score move without any new filing?
Because the public version uses market capitalization in one term, so the score changes whenever the share price does. A score quoted without a date is incomplete, and a sharp fall may reflect only a re-rating of the stock.
What is the grey zone?
The band between the distress and safe thresholds where the original analysis found no reliable discrimination. It is a stated finding rather than a hedge, and reporting it as "moderately risky" misrepresents what the model claims.
Does a distress-zone score mean bankruptcy is coming?
No. It means the ratios resemble those of companies that failed within two years in the study sample. Many companies have sat in that zone for years without failing, and the score has no view on timing.